Case documentation
Bring the available records into a clear chronology
Organise transaction records, correspondence and supporting documents so the agreed report can explain the information reviewed, the findings and any unresolved questions.
- Identification of the originating transaction and addresses
- Transaction mapping across incoming and outgoing flows
- Wallet relationship and pattern analysis
- Chronological reconstruction of asset movement
- Documented evidence with timestamps and references
- Reports suitable for onward compliance or legal review
- Describe the issue
- Review the proposal
- Review the available records
- Receive the outcome
A record that can be followed
Transaction references, dates, correspondence and supporting documents are organised into a clear chronology so readers can understand what happened and which records support it.
Supporting records
Where included in the agreed scope, records requested by an account provider or professional adviser can be organised alongside the case summary. The recipient decides whether they meet its requirements.
Clear about uncertainty
The report identifies unresolved questions and evidential gaps. A blockchain address alone does not establish a person's identity or ownership of funds.
What a review can establish
Public blockchain records can show transaction activity, but an address alone does not establish a person's identity or ownership of funds. Findings depend on the quality and completeness of the available evidence.
Tracing a transaction does not reverse it or create access to a wallet. A report does not establish that assets are available for withdrawal.
Any recovery depends on the circumstances and actions by the relevant asset holders, providers or authorities; no outcome is guaranteed.